Home Archived April 13, 2016
(i)

U.S. Geological Survey

Maps, Imagery, and Publications Hazards Newsroom Education Jobs Partnerships Library About USGS Social Media

USGS Newsroom

USGS Newsroom  
 

USGS Studies Cast Major Doubts on Geologic Theory of How Volcanic Regions Created: Mantle Plumes May Be Nonexistent After All
Released: 12/6/2002

Contact Information:
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Office of Communication
119 National Center
Reston, VA 20192
Bob Christiansen 1-click interview
Phone: 650-329-5201

Gillian Foulger
Phone: 650-329-4143

Catherine Puckett
Phone: 707-442-1329



NOTE: During Dec. 6-10, at AGU: To arrange interviews, please contact Catherine Puckett or Stephanie Hanna in the AGU press room, 415-905-1007, or (Stephanie) 206-331-0335 or (Catherine) 650-222-9750

Standard fare in geology textbooks and school classrooms across the world is that the hot springs, geysers and volcanoes of Yellowstone National Park, Hawaii, Iceland, and many other volcanic regions were "created" by plumes of hot rock that rise from near the Earth’s core. New results from recently published U.S. Geological Survey research hint, astonishingly, that such plumes may not exist at all.

Results from seismic tomography, a method that uses earthquake waves to "CAT scan" the Earth’s secretive goings-on, suggest that the magma system beneath Yellowstone is only skin deep – shallower than 120 miles, far less than the 1,750 miles scientists would expect if the magma arose from near the Earth’s molten core as has been thought for decades. The results of USGS scientists Bob Christiansen, Gillian Foulger and their colleagues research on purported mantle plumes beneath Yellowstone and Iceland were published in the October edition of the Bulletin of the Geological Society of America and will be presented at the American Geophysical Union’s meeting in San Francisco on Dec. 8.

"The seismic results don’t come as a surprise to me," said Christiansen, a research geologist based in Menlo Park, Calif. "Those of us familiar with the geology of the Yellowstone region began to realize that although the plume model was at odds with many geological observations there was nevertheless a steady stream of papers that speculatively attributed everything there as evidence for a plume. The new tomographic results are consistent with the geologic data in demonstrating the absence of a deep-seated mantle plume."

The Yellowstone results have implications that range much farther than just the local geology of America’s first National Park. A progressively older trail of volcanic rock stretches westward across Wyoming, Idaho and Nevada for more than 200 miles from Yellowstone, following the eastern Snake River Plain. Geologists have interpreted this "trail" as the "geologic remains" of past volcanism left behind as the North American plate slowly drifted over the fixed Yellowstone plume.

Similar trails elsewhere also have been attributed to mantle plumes. In particular, noted Christiansen, the spectacular chain of volcanic islands that stretches from the Big Island of Hawaii, northwest along the Hawaiian island chain, is commonly considered compelling evidence for a plume and is the "textbook" example of how mantle plumes "work" to create volcanic islands and other geologic features above the Earth’s surface.

"If Yellowstone can leave a volcano trail without a plume, then other hotspots might also," Christiansen said. "The implication is that Hawaii may not be underlain by a plume after all. A group of U.S. universities is conducting a major seismic experiment there in the fall of 2003 that may settle the question for once and all."

Seismic tomography has also been conducted at Iceland, also traditionally considered to be a landform created by a mantle plume. Geophysicist Gillian Foulger, working at the USGS while visiting from the University of Durham, U.K., is critically reappraising the evidence for a plume at Iceland.

"When I was a student, I was never introduced to the idea that plumes could just be a theory," Foulger said. "When our seismic results from Iceland simply didn’t fit with that model I was completely perplexed. I soon found that I was not alone in doubting the plume model. We feel that challenging the plume model is like David taking on Goliath, but ultimately researchers must call their scientific results as they see them."

The results from Yellowstone and Iceland are drawing wide attention in the geological community because many other kinds of geologic data have only been able to be interpreted in terms of the plume model with great difficulty. A growing number of Earth scientists are thus taking a second look at their own data, and are starting to cast around for alternatives to one of their favorite ideas, Christiansen and Foulger said.

For more information:

http://www.dur.ac.uk/g.r.foulger/ChrisEtAlGSA2002.pdf
http://www.dur.ac.uk/g.r.foulger/A_G.pdf
http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Volcanoes/Yellowstone/description_yellowstone.html
http://cires.colorado.edu/people/dueker.ken/MELT_harro.html
http://geology.about.com/library/weekly/aa022298.htm
http://geology.about.com/library/weekly/aa011401a.htm


The USGS serves the nation by providing reliable scientific information to describe and understand the Earth; minimize loss of life and property from natural disasters; manage water, biological, energy, and mineral resources; and enhance and protect our quality of life.

Subscribe to receive the latest USGS news releases.

**** www.usgs.gov ****

Links and contacts within this release are valid at the time of publication.


 

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=318
Page Contact Information: Ask USGS
Page Last Modified: 12/6/2002