Home Archived April 13, 2016

U.S. Geological Survey

Maps, Imagery, and Publications Hazards Newsroom Education Jobs Partnerships Library About USGS Social Media

USGS Newsroom

USGS Newsroom  

Hotter, Drier Climate Leads to More Tree Deaths from Fire
Released: 7/25/2013 4:00:00 PM

Contact Information:
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Office of Communications and Publishing
12201 Sunrise Valley Dr, MS 119
Reston, VA 20192
Ben Young  Landis, USGS 1-click interview
Phone: 916-616-9468

Michael  Sullivan, USFS
Phone: 510-499-0227

In partnership with: U.S. Forest Service

ARCATA, Calif. — Climate change is expected to amplify both droughts and wildfires across the western United States. A new study shows that the effects of drought and fire work in combination, such that forests experiencing drought will see more dead trees in the aftermath of wildfires.

"There is a lot of research showing that climate change is already increasing wildfire frequency and fire spread," says forest ecologist Phillip van Mantgem of the U.S. Geological Survey and lead author of the study. "But what this study shows is that there is an additional risk to warming trends — namely that trees already stressed by drought may be more likely to die from fires."

The study was published this week in the journal Ecology Letters, and was a collaborative effort of U.S. Geological Survey, National Park Service and U.S. Forest Service.

Researchers studied conifer forests in areas that had recently experienced prescribed fire across Arizona, California, Colorado, Montana, New Mexico, Oregon, and Utah, examining data from 1984 to 2005 for more than 7,000 individual coniferous trees, including familiar species such as ponderosa pine, white fir, and Douglas fir.

They used this information to estimate the risk factors involved in tree mortality, and they found more trees dying at sites where high temperatures were lengthening the duration of summer drought.

"Our results imply that if current warming trends continue, we can expect to see more frequent tree deaths following fire, which can lead to substantial changes in forests," says van Mantgem. "Such changes could ultimately affect habitat suitability for wildlife species, aggravate erosion and increase the amounts of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere from fires."

The analysis did not consider other factors that could also exacerbate climatic warming effects on tree deaths. For example, warmer temperatures may increase the activity of tree pathogens and insect pests. Also, the forest data were solely drawn from prescribed fire events. Researchers hope to address these factors in future research, and include data from unplanned wildfires.

Nevertheless, the new study offers some valuable insights for forest managers.

"Understanding the relationship between climatic water deficit and tree mortality from fires adds some important wrinkles to how we manage forests," says Eric Knapp, a research ecologist with U.S. Forest Service's Pacific Southwest Research Station and a study co-author. "If the goal is to minimize tree mortality while removing accumulated fuels, managers may wish to conduct prescribed burns at times when trees are not already under stress from drought or other problems. However, if the objective is to reduce the density of an overstocked forest, prescribed burning might actually be more effective when done during dryer than normal periods."

The study was conducted by researchers from the USGS Western Ecological Research Center, NPS National Interagency Fire Center, USFS Pacific Southwest Research Station and the USGS California Water Science Center, with support from the U.S. Joint Fire Science Program.

Locations and tree species included in the data for the van Mantgem et al. 2013 study

LocationsApproximate Tree Species Composition of Forests Plots Studied
Bandelier National Monument, N.M. ponderosa pine 89%, white fir 6%, Douglas fir 4%
Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah white fir 49%, Douglas fir 23%, ponderosa pine 22%, limber pine 5%, Rocky Mountain juniper 2%
El Malpais National Monument, N.M. ponderosa pine 92%, Colorado pinyon 6%, one-seed juniper 1%, Douglas fir 1%
Lubrecht Forest, Mont. ponderosa pine 62%, Douglas fir 35%, lodgepole pine 2%, western larch 1%
Glacier National Park, Mont. lodgepole pine 40%, ponderosa pine 39%, Douglas fir 10%, western larch 9%, Engelmann spruce 1%
Golden Gate National Recreation Area, Calif. coast redwood 77%, Douglas fir 23%
Grand Canyon National Park, Ariz. ponderosa pine 70%, white fir 10%, Colorado pinyon 10%, Utah juniper 7%, Engelmann spruce 2%, Rocky Mountain fir 1%, Douglas fir 1%
John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Ore. western juniper 100%
Lava Beds National Monument, Calif. ponderosa pine 100%
Lassen Volcanic National Park, Calif. white fir 50%, ponderosa pine 28%, lodgepole pine 12%, California incense cedar 5%, Jeffrey pine 4%
Pinnacles National Park, Calif. gray pine 100%
Redwood National Park, Calif. coast redwood 90%, grand fir 10%
Rocky Mountain National Park, Colo. lodgepole pine 71%, ponderosa pine 24%, Douglas fir 6%
Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, Calif. white fir 44%, California incense cedar 17%, sugar pine 15%, giant sequoia 13%, ponderosa pine 9%, silvertip fir 2%
Whiskeytown National Recreation Area, Calif. knobcone pine 41%, white fir 26%, ponderosa pine 17%, sugar pine 13%, California incense cedar 1%, Douglas fir 1%
Yosemite National Park, Calif. white fir 39%, California incense cedar 21%, ponderosa pine 21%, silvertip fir 8%, sugar pine 8%, Jeffrey pine 1%, Douglas fir 1%

USGS provides science for a changing world. Visit USGS.gov, and follow us on Twitter @USGS and our other social media channels.
Subscribe to our news releases via e-mail, RSS or Twitter.

Links and contacts within this release are valid at the time of publication.



Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=3649
Page Contact Information: Ask USGS
Page Last Modified: 7/25/2013 9:50:06 AM